Will Mitt Romney try to steal the US presidential election?
And if he does, will Americans – especially African-Americans – take to the streets?
These are the two key questions of the 2012 election season. Yet the mainstream media, owned by the same interests behind the “black-box” voting machines that manufacture election outcomes, won't touch the issue.
Despite
the thunderous silence of the media, all signs are pointing towards
another neocon-Republican election theft attempt, like the successful
ones of 2000 and 2004.
One warning sign: The appearance of blatantly fraudulent public opinion polls
giving Romney a substantial lead over Obama. While all other polls show
that Obama has enough of an edge in the swing states to constitute an
electoral-college “firewall,” Gallup's national polls – using a “likely
voter” model that apparently posits an inverse correlation between
voting and skin pigmentation – currently give Romney an edge of more
than five points in the popular vote.
Why
would the Republicans falsify a prominent national poll? To give Romney
“momentum,” and create the illusion of plausibility when rigged voting
machines hand him a “surprise victory.”
But why just one poll?
Because it's doable. Rigging ALL the polls is a herculean task, even for a party backed by the world's biggest crime syndicate.
Is there any evidence that Romney will try to steal the swing states he needs to capture the White House? Unfortunately, yes.
Believe
it or not, Romney actually OWNS the black-box voting machines that will
fabricate – not count – the votes in Ohio, the most important swing
state. (“Black box” machines are designed with no transparent link
between the votes that go in, and the “results” that come out.)
As my recent radio guest Bob Fitrakis and two co-authors explain in their article Does the Romney Family Now Own Your e-Vote:
Will
you cast your vote this fall on a faulty electronic machine that's
partly owned by the Romney Family? Will that machine decide whether
Romney will then inherit the White House?
Through
a closely held equity fund called Solamere, Mitt Romney and his wife,
son and brother are major investors in an investment firm called H.I.G.
Capital. H.I.G. in turn holds a majority share and three out of five
board members in Hart Intercivic, a company that owns the notoriously
faulty electronic voting machines that will count the ballots in swing
state Ohio November 7. Hart machines will also be used elsewhere in the
United States ( Hart Intercivic).
In
other words, a candidate for the presidency of the United States, and
his brother, wife and son, have a straight-line financial interest in
the voting machines that could decide this fall's election. These
machines cannot be monitored by the public. But they will help decide
who "owns" the White House.
They
are especially crucial in Ohio, without which no Republican candidate
has ever won the White House. In 2004, in the dead of election night, an
electronic swing of more than 300,000 votes switched Ohio from the John
Kerry column to George W. Bush, giving him a second term. A virtual
statistical impossibility, the 6-plus% shift occurred between 12:20 and
2am election night as votes were being tallied by a GOP-controlled
information technology firm on servers in a basement in Chattanooga,
Tennessee... (Read the complete article here.)
And it gets worse. Karl Rove and the Republican election fraud machine not only stole the 2004 elections, they
murdered the computer expert who orchestrated the theft, Mike Connell,
shortly before he was scheduled to testify in court against Rove.
Since
the appearance of black box voting machines, a massive five-point gap
has opened up between actual vote counts, as documented by exit polls,
and the “official results” manufactured by the machines. In every single
case, the five-point edge favors the Republicans.
This should not be
surprising, since the voting machines (like the votes they fabricate)
are manufactured by Republicans.
Last
summer, here in Wisconsin, the exit polls showed that Republican
Governor Scott Walker did not win his recall election. But the black-box
machines gave him the obligatory five-point Republican edge.
Since
the discrepancies between exit polls and black-box-machine-manufactured
results are so obvious, the powers-that-be have decided to get rid of
exit polling in 19 states - a decision that virtually guarantees a
fraudulent 2012 election. As the Washington Post suggests, "The Fix" is in.
Former President Jimmy Carter
says that American elections, unlike elections in banana republics, are
so hopelessly corrupt that they are not even worth monitoring. Carter
should know; he was overthrown in an “October Surprise” coup d'état by
the Bush Crime Family in 1980, as revealed by former Bush Administration official Barbara Honegger.
Since
the Republicans blatantly and shamelessly stole the presidential
elections in 2000 and 2004, why did they refrain from stealing the 2008
elections? Perhaps Obama's margin of victory was simply too wide for a
“surprise McCain win” to be even remotely plausible. And perhaps they
actually didn't mind allowing Obama, a timid, compromising Democrat, to
put anti-Bush-war Americans back to sleep for a few years.
- Republicans are blanketing African-American neighborhoods with these billboards to try to terrorize people into not voting.
There
is one more factor that may have prevented an election theft in 2008,
and might complicate one in 2012: The fear that Obama supporters in
general, and black people in particular, might engage in widespread,
unruly protests that would draw unwanted attention to the Republican
election fraud machine.
As my Truth Jihad Radio guest John Hankey put it,
African-Americans, unlike white liberals, are not “a bunch of pussies.”
Kill white liberal heroes JFK and RFK, or steal the presidency from
white liberals Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, or John Kerry, and the white
liberals are too terrified to even whimper. Kill a black hero like
Martin Luther King, or even just beat up an ordinary black guy like
Rodney King, and African Americans might just get angry enough to
protest in a fashion that cannot be ignored.
If
Romney steals the election, and African-Americans pour into the
streets, they will be joined, at least in some areas, by angry whites,
hispanics, and others.
After
Rodney King was brutally beaten on-camera by police, I participated in
the huge protests that shut down San Francisco's Financial District. And
I wasn't the only white guy out there. All kinds of people – white,
black, latino, male, female – took to the streets to make the owners of
the Financial District take a multi-million-dollar hit, driving home the
message that we weren't going to stand for this kind of racist outrage.
If the Republicans steal another presidential election, this time from the first African-American president, and award it to a career criminal responsible for flooding America's black neighborhoods with crack cocaine
– an empty-suit android who perfectly embodies every negative
stereotype about rich white guys, and then some – America might
experience a wave of protests that would make the aftermaths of the
Martin Luther King assassination, and the Rodney King beating, look like
a picnic in the park.
Labels: assassinations, Barbara Honegger, black box voting, bob fitrakis, bush crime family, election fraud, election theft, hart intercivic, john hankey, Karl Rove, Mike Connell, money laundering, Romney, solamere